Search for: "Applied Optical Systems, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2013, 5:40 am
Apple Seeks Patent for Parental Controls on Pre-Paid Debit CardsApple Inc. is always applying for protections on different device designs and computer systems. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:17 pm
Applied Optical Systems, Inc., 2009 WL 3571350(E.D.Tex. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 9:18 pm
[…] Specifically, Suprema argues that the claimed lens system excludes “non-lens elements” and “off-axis optics” because those were disavowed in the written description of the ’993 patent. [read post]
16 May 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Baker Hughes Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
In this case, plaintiffs Crane Security Technologies, Inc. and Visual Physics, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Crane Technologies, Inc. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 7:27 am
Applied Optical Systems, Inc., (Case No. 2:06-cv-473 (E.D. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 7:27 am
Applied Optical Systems, Inc., (Case No. 2:06-cv-473 (E.D. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 8:58 pm
Quad/Tech, Inc., No. 2012- 002457 (B.P.A.I. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:32 pm
US Patent 6904191 - Xerox, priority March 19, 2003Claim 1 - "A micro-electro-mechanical system optical switch, comprising: a cantilever beam optical switch associated with a plurality of optical waveguides formed on a flexible cantilever beam for switching optical states. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:59 am
Tellabs Inc., No. 04-1687 (CCH Federal Securities Law Reporter ¶94,560).The complaint against Tellabs, a maker of equipment used in fiber optics network, arose from statements made primarily by CEO Richard Notebaert about demand for the company's principal product, a switching system. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 8:03 am
CyberPower Systems (USA), Inc., 2017 NCBC 57, that “[t]he courts have an obligation to protect nonparties from burden and expense imposed without sufficient justification. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 9:54 pm
Verifone, Inc., No. 2014-1135 (Fed. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
Zenni Optical LLC, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida holding that Aspex was collaterally estopped from pursuing the suit against Zenni based on earlier litigation between Aspex and Altair Eyewear, Inc. for infringement of the same patents. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 1:18 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:29 pm
Openet Telecom, Inc., No. 1:10cv910 (E.D.Va 2013), the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia faced a motion to tax costs in this patent infringement case. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
Superior Optical Labs, Inc. protested the award. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:45 am
By Jason Rantanen American Medical Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 3:21 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 2:30 pm
Thus, claim 1 is directed to “[a] visual inspection system configured to be in optical communication with a substrate of a printing press, said visual inspection system comprising: . . . [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:38 am
Check this explanation: “Prior to January 1, 2006, only the interest costs incurred during the construction period of significant capital projects, such as construction of an undersea fiber optic cable system, were capitalized. [read post]
